On Jun 22, Lance Lin <LQi254@protonmail.com> wrote: > Yes, from my understanding it is a "drop in" replacement for OpenSSL. One of my packages (Workflow) uses it but can also use OpenSSL. > > I think this package will be beneficial to the Workflow users and downstream OS's. Can you explain exactly what benefits these users have from using BabaSSL instad of OpenSSL? And why only these users and not the users of other current dependencies of OpenSSL? -- ciao, Marco
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature