On Mon, 2022-05-30 at 14:30 +0200, Dylan Aïssi wrote: > libpipewire recommends pipewire for a reason [1], do you mean this is > not a good reason? > > [1] https://salsa.debian.org/utopia-team/pipewire/-/merge_requests/1 In the patch Philip Withnall wrote: > libpipewire dlopens modules from pipewire (such as `libspa-support.so`), > and relies on being able to connect to the pipewire daemon to function. Since libspa-support.so is in libspa-0.2-modules not in pipewire, probably that should be Recommended too? $ apt-file search libspa-support.so libspa-0.2-modules: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/spa-0.2/support/libspa-support.so -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part