muon-build seems more consistent with its own domain name muon.build, the reference meson implementation's domain name mesonbuild.com, and theirshared dependency ninja being packaged as ninja-build.
Yeah it makes sense. I'll also ask upstream for their opinion, but muon-build seem to be the most appropriate name.
And if KDE Muon is indeed dead, simply having a "Conflicts: muon" and using the same path should be ok as well?
I had the same idea, even if it is not extremely elegant. But Paul doesn't seem to agree; why?
-- OpenPGP key: 66DE F152 8299 0C21 99EF A801 A8A1 28A8 AB1C EE49