[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: feedback for NEW packages: switch to using the BTS?



What does it help to have it sitting there instead of rejected?
I gave it more thought, and I don't think it has to be sitting in
the NEW queue at all. As far as I understand it, the main advantage
to gain is additional context; a bug report provides documentation
and a place to discuss solutions for packaging issues, especially if
the NEW package is maintained by a team. None of this requires the
packages to keep waiting in NEW, it just requires the BTS to learn
about them, so the bug reports can be assigned properly.

There are probably edge cases to consider (such as invalid package
names or hijacking uploads) where it is not possible to assign the
bugs. I still like the idea to expand the BTS scope to include
pre-archive packaging bugs, provided that the assumption that most
rejected package uploads will be fixed and accepted eventually,
holds.


Cheers
Timo

--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀   ╭────────────────────────────────────────────────────╮
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁   │ Timo Röhling                                       │
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀   │ 9B03 EBB9 8300 DF97 C2B1  23BF CC8C 6BDD 1403 F4CA │
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀   ╰────────────────────────────────────────────────────╯

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: