[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: rebuild of rpcbind (and other packages?) due to old debhelper bug 993316



On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 03:22:07PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Due to the old bug 993316 in debhelper[*], rpcbind is still buggy as
> it hasn't been rebuilt yet: rpcbind_1.2.6-2_amd64.deb contains
> 
> -rw-r--r-- root/root       626 2021-08-17 17:31:36 ./usr/lib/systemd/system/rpcbind.service
> -rw-r--r-- root/root       325 2021-08-17 17:31:36 ./usr/lib/systemd/system/rpcbind.socket
> lrwxrwxrwx root/root         0 2021-08-17 17:31:36 ./lib/systemd/system/portmap.service -> rpcbind.service
> 
> thus with a dangling symlink, while this should be
> 
> /lib/systemd/system/rpcbind.service
> /lib/systemd/system/rpcbind.socket
> /lib/systemd/system/portmap.service -> rpcbind.service
> 
> i.e. without the "/usr".
> 
> Bug 993316 was fixed on 23 September 2021. Any reason why rpcbind
> hasn't been rebuilt yet?
> 
> I don't know whether there are other affected packages.
> 
> [*] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=993316
> 
> -- 
> Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/>
> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
> 


Hi,

I just uploaded rpcbind_1.2.6-3[1], which is rebuilt using the latest
debhelper version.

For future situations like this, I encorage you to fill a bug
against the affected package. Posting it in a mailing list
with such a heavy traffic without copying the maintainer could
make slower the fix.

Cheers,


[1]: https://tracker.debian.org/news/1317126/accepted-rpcbind-126-3-source-into-unstable/

---
Josue Ortega
«Happy Hacking»
http://josueortega.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: