Re: The future of src:ntp
Richard Laager wrote on 19/01/2022:
> On 1/18/22 11:21 AM, Paride Legovini wrote:
> > I'd prefer making ntp a dummy package depending on ntpsec rather than
> > having src:ntpsec takeover bin:ntp.
>
> If I understand correctly, you're suggesting src:ntp builds bin:ntp that
> is a dummy package which depends on ntpsec?
That's what I had in mind, but the other option:
> Another option would be to have src:ntpsec build the bin:ntp dummy
> package and remove src:ntp entirely.
also looks sensible to me after all. No strong opinion.
Paride
Reply to: