[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Epoch bump request for ksh

On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 07:37:55PM +0530, Anuradha Weeraman wrote:
> > 2) If you do go ahead with switching to the community distribution, then
> > "93u+m" is part of the name, not the version number, so I'd suggest:
> > 
> > 1:1.0.0~beta.1-1
> It does make sense to differentiate with the 93u+m prefix. Amending the
> proposed version below:
> 1:93u+m-1.0.0~beta.1-1

Correction: rushed the last email, I meant to say that I agree that 93u+m
is not part of the version per se. I just thought that it would be good
to include, just for specificity.  However, amending the proposed version
as suggested since it makes sense:




Reply to: