[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Debian choice of upstream tarballs for packaging



Hello zigo,

On Wed 25 Aug 2021 at 04:11PM +02, Thomas Goirand wrote:

> I wrote this many times, but I don't see why we should use any "upstream
> tarball" when the Git repository itself contains the tarball with:
>
> git archive --prefix=$(DEBPKGNAME)-$(VERSION)/ $(GIT_TAG) \
> 	| xz >../$(DEBPKGNAME)_$(VERSION).orig.tar.xz
>
> (which leads to a .xz, which is nicer)
>
> Not only then, only only has to merge the upstream tag in the Debian
> branch to get the new release, but on top, no need to "gbp import" or
> "pristine-tar commit", and a single packaging branch becomes enough.
>
> I very much wish this packaging workflow gained more traction, and the
> pristine-tar abomination dies...

I agree.

I'd like to suggest using 'git deborig' which is much shorter to type :)

-- 
Sean Whitton

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: