Hello Raphael, On Sat 05 Sep 2020 at 04:31PM -07, Sean Whitton wrote: > Hello Raphael, > > On Sun 30 Aug 2020 at 10:02AM -07, Sean Whitton wrote: > >> I think we should recommend debian/sid because for some years dgit has >> been generating branches called dgit/sid. I think it would smooth the >> integration between branches on salsa and branches on dgit.debian.org >> if both always used codenames. > > Haven't heard back from you on this -- do you happen to know whether > debian/sid or debian/unstable is in greater use on salsa right now? I > would agree on standardising on d/unstable if it is already in > significantly wider use. There are arguments both ways here but as you're the person driving this, I'm still keen to hear more from you about why debian/unstable is to be preferred over debian/sid giving the existing convention established by dgit. Thanks. -- Sean Whitton
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature