[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#969146: ITP: python-ipmi -- Pure Python IPMI library



Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Benjamin Drung <benjamin.drung@cloud.ionos.com>

* Package name    : python-ipmi
  Version         : 0.4.2
  Upstream Author : Kontron Europe GmbH
* URL             : https://github.com/kontron/python-ipmi
* License         : LGPL-2.1+
  Programming Lang: Python
  Description     : Pure Python IPMI library

 The Intelligent Platform Management Interface (IPMI) is a set of computer
 interface specifications for an autonomous computer subsystem that provides
 management and monitoring capabilities independently of the host system’s CPU,
 firmware (BIOS or UEFI) and operating system. The python-ipmi library provides
 an application programming interface (API) for using IPMI protocol within the
 Python environment. This library supports IPMI version 2.0 as described in the
 IPMI standard.
 .
 There are two ways to communicate with a server using IPMI interface:
  1. IPMI over Local Area Network (LAN) using Remote Management Control
     Protocol (RMCP) packet datagrams
  2. Intelligent Platform Management Bus (IPMB) is an I2C-based bus
 .
 Features:
 .
  * native RMCP interface (using Python libraries only)
  * legacy RMCP interface (requires ipmitool to be installed)
  * IPMB interface (using the Total Phase Aardvark)

We want to use this library internally in our company. I plan to maintain this
package as part of the Debian Python Modules Team. Co-maintainers are welcome.

-- 
Benjamin Drung

DevOps Engineer and Debian & Ubuntu Developer
Platform Integration (IONOS Cloud)

1&1 IONOS SE | Greifswalder Str. 207 | 10405 Berlin | Germany
E-mail: benjamin.drung@cloud.ionos.com | Web: www.ionos.de

Hauptsitz Montabaur, Amtsgericht Montabaur, HRB 24498

Vorstand: Dr. Christian Böing, Hüseyin Dogan, Dr. Martin Endreß, Hans-Henning
Kettler, Arthur Mai, Matthias Steinberg, Achim Weiß
Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Markus Kadelke


Member of United Internet

Reply to: