Re: What to do when DD considers policy to be optional? [kubernetes]
On Thu, 9 Apr 2020 09:36:22 +0200, Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org>
wrote:
>On 4/8/20 10:58 PM, Michael Stone wrote:
>> Or, if they're not clear about what
>> adopting this tool means, I agree that isn't in their interest for them
>> to see that there's a debian package and be fooled into thinking it
>> doesn't require this deployment model just because there's a zombie
>> package in debian stable which will be essentially unsupported
>
>If the package becomes a "zombie package" as you describe, then you're
>right. Hopefully, that's not the plan!
A package without upstream support is bound to be a zombie. We don't
have the resources to provide support on the same level like an actice
upstream community does.
Greetings
Marc
--
-------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -----
Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " |
Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834
Reply to: