On Mi, 08 apr 20, 16:44:22, Peter Silva wrote: > doesn´t this whole discussion just mean that k8 should just not be in > Debian? > > It should be a third party package, perhaps with a third party repo, and > just not be in Debian at all. > If any means of packaging for a Debian release results in a package that is > essentially unsupported by upstream... what is the value of including it? > For stuff that moves too quickly... perhaps a > different repo like *forever-sid.d.o* could be set up... and have it built > against releases, so people > have current software for Debian... without it being part of Debian. > > That repo would have different rules for it... that loosens things up for > this kind of hairball package that isn´t stable enough to benefit from > Debian stability. You mean something like http://fasttrack.debian.net ? Kind regards, Andrei -- http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature