Hello, On Sun 15 Mar 2020 at 10:48PM +01, Philipp Kern wrote: > Now we could also fix that using a whitelist approach. But I have not > seen much openness to tackling this part of NEW review and I am unsure > why. From the public NEW tooling (I don't know dak's side) it pretty > clearly does not look like a de novo review, as the diff to the archive > is highlighted. Maybe another way would be to split the queue using a > weighting function. Not sure what diff you have in mind, aside from the fact that https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html does indicate whether it's source-NEW or binary-NEW. On the other side you just get a whole source package and a list of which files in the .changes are NEW. > But I am not aware of public documentation on how the review process > is organized currently. Is there any? Yes: https://salsa.debian.org/ftp-team/manpages For the mc extensions mentioned there, you can see my dotfiles: https://git.spwhitton.name/dotfiles/tree/.config/mc?h=fasolo https://git.spwhitton.name/dotfiles/tree/.local/share/mc/extfs.d?h=fasolo -- Sean Whitton
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature