Re: archive: bullseye Sources files contain multiple versions of packages - why?

["Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>]

On Fri, 2020-10-02 at 18:37 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Christian,
> 
> On 02-10-2020 17:05, Christian Kastner wrote:
> > I've stumbled another case in buster-backports [1], where Sources
> > has the following versions of src:libreoffice.
> > 
> >   Version: 1:6.3.4-2~bpo10+1
> >   Version: 1:6.4.5-1~bpo10+1
> >   Version: 1:7.0.1-1~bpo10+2
> > 
> > But none of the records have "Extra-Source-Only: yes" set.
> 
> $ rmadison libreoffice --suite buster-backports
> libreoffice | 1:6.3.4-2~bpo10+1 | buster-backports | source
> libreoffice | 1:6.4.5-1~bpo10+1 | buster-backports | source, armel
> libreoffice | 1:7.0.1-1~bpo10+2 | buster-backports | source, amd64,
> arm64, armhf, i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
> 
> explains already one version: the armel one.

A little bit of further digging suggests that someone[TM] should file
an RM report for:

libreoffice-gtk2 | 1:6.3.4-2~bpo10+1 | buster-backports | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
uno-libs3        | 6.3.4-2~bpo10+1   | buster-backports | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x

which appear to be cruft.

Regards,

Adam