[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [Summary]: RFC: Standardizing source package artifacts build paths

Michael Biebl dijo [Mon, May 04, 2020 at 11:51:05AM +0200]:
> >> Personally, I don't see any real benefit of standardizing on (making up an 
> >> example here) debian/.build over debian/build.
> > 
> > Same here. The arguments against debian/build are very weak. If we care
> > about a source package building a binary package named "build" or
> > whatever, it's really a unique case and surely it can be built with
> > some overrides and passing a different path where needed.
> If you want to avoid name collisions, you could also use
> debian/_build
> I kinda like the idea of prefixing *all* temporary directory with a '_'

Completely reasonable and almost auto-explaining, I'd say. +1 for
Michael's suggestion.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: