Michael Biebl dijo [Mon, May 04, 2020 at 11:51:05AM +0200]: > >> Personally, I don't see any real benefit of standardizing on (making up an > >> example here) debian/.build over debian/build. > > > > Same here. The arguments against debian/build are very weak. If we care > > about a source package building a binary package named "build" or > > whatever, it's really a unique case and surely it can be built with > > some overrides and passing a different path where needed. > > If you want to avoid name collisions, you could also use > debian/_build > > I kinda like the idea of prefixing *all* temporary directory with a '_' Completely reasonable and almost auto-explaining, I'd say. +1 for Michael's suggestion.
Description: PGP signature