Re: Python3 modules not built for all supported Python versions
On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 15:30:01 +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> does this mean that build-depending on python3-dev is wrong in general and
> should instead be replaced by build-depending on python3-all-dev?
It is only wrong for packages that build Python 3 extensions (binary
modules) that are intended to be loadable by all supported Python
3 versions (roughly: `find /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages -name '*.so'`).
For packages that embed Python 3, like the versions of vim that
have Python scripting support, or packages that use a Python 3
extension as an internal implementation detail of some tool, like
gobject-introspection, my understanding is that build-depending
on python3-dev continues to be appropriate. These extensions would
ideally be installed in a private directory, like gobject-introspection's
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gobject-introspection/giscanner/_giscanner.cpython-38-x86_64-linux-gnu.so
- but I know some upstreams and some downstream maintainers (arguably
incorrectly) package private extensions as though they were public
extensions, because the mechanics of doing so are much simpler.
> For example the package src:ros-geometry2 has a super simple
> dh-style rules file, basically just doing:
>
> %:
> dh $@ --buildsystem=cmake --with python3
>
> What would I have to change to successfully fix this problem?
The general answer is that you would have to build it repeatedly in a
loop, with each supported version of Python 3 in turn. I am not aware
of a way to do this in a similarly simple rules file.
smcv
Reply to: