On Mar 29, Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org> wrote: > While it's true that we might need to use such pathnames in debian/rules > or debhelper fragment files (which some might consider ugly), IMO that > has always felt like a sign that there's something missing in our > packaging helpers/tools. If you believe this then it means that you have been maintaining too modern or too much simple packages. https://salsa.debian.org/md/inn/-/blob/master/debian/rules https://salsa.debian.org/md/inn2/-/blob/master/debian/rules https://salsa.debian.org/md/kmod/-/blob/master/debian/rules https://salsa.debian.org/md/binkd/-/blob/master/debian/rules https://salsa.debian.org/md/libxcrypt/-/blob/master/debian/rules -- ciao, Marco
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature