Re: Lintian is complaining about udebs?
On 2020-03-21 00:39 -0400, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> Just checking --- this looks like a Really Bad regression in Lintian
> 2.57.0, correct?
Seems so, I can can confirm it with Lintian 2.58.0.
> E: e2fsprogs-udeb udeb: debian-changelog-file-missing
> E: e2fsprogs buildinfo: field-too-long Installed-Build-Depends (5090 chars > 5000)
> E: e2fsprogs-udeb udeb: file-in-etc-not-marked-as-conffile etc/mke2fs.conf
> E: e2fsprogs-udeb udeb: no-copyright-file
> W: e2fsprogs-udeb udeb: binary-without-manpage sbin/badblocks
> W: e2fsprogs-udeb udeb: binary-without-manpage sbin/e2fsck
> W: e2fsprogs-udeb udeb: binary-without-manpage sbin/e2label
> W: e2fsprogs-udeb udeb: binary-without-manpage sbin/e2mmpstatus
> W: e2fsprogs-udeb udeb: binary-without-manpage sbin/fsck.ext2
> W: e2fsprogs-udeb udeb: binary-without-manpage sbin/fsck.ext3
> W: e2fsprogs-udeb udeb: binary-without-manpage sbin/fsck.ext4
> W: e2fsprogs-udeb udeb: binary-without-manpage sbin/mke2fs
> W: e2fsprogs-udeb udeb: binary-without-manpage sbin/mkfs.ext2
> W: e2fsprogs-udeb udeb: binary-without-manpage sbin/mkfs.ext3
> W: e2fsprogs-udeb udeb: binary-without-manpage sbin/mkfs.ext4
> W: e2fsprogs-udeb udeb: binary-without-manpage sbin/resize2fs
> W: e2fsprogs-udeb udeb: binary-without-manpage sbin/tune2fs
> N: 5 tags overridden (2 errors, 3 info)
>
> By *definition* udebs aren't supposed to have changelogs, copyright
> files, or man pages, right?
Right.
Cheers,
Sven
Reply to: