[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFC: Replacing vim-tiny with nano in essential packages

Boyuan Yang wrote:
> At least someone please adopt nvi first... we cannot introduce a
> package into d-i without a maintainer [2].
> Besides, nvi does not have an active upstream.

Ack; or use busybox, as others suggested in the thread.

Reply to: