Quoting Sam Hartman (2020-03-04 23:47:00) > >>>>> "Anthony" == Anthony Fok <foka@debian.org> writes: > > Anthony> Indeed, which option is easier or more feasible depends on > Anthony> the scenario. > > Anthony> In this particular case with pydoctor, I was quite lucky > Anthony> because its included bootstrap.min.css is exactly what > Anthony> Twitter distributed officially, so the exact unminified > Anthony> version was easily found: > > Anthony> Files: > Anthony> debian/missing-sources/pydoctor/templates/bootstrap.css > Anthony> pydoctor/templates/bootstrap.min.css Copyright: 2011-2015 > Anthony> Twitter, Inc. Embedded copy of normalize.css v3.0.2: > Anthony> 2011-2014 Nicolas Gallagher License: Expat Comment: These > Anthony> files are copies of vanilla Bootstrap v3.3.4 CSS files, > Anthony> identical to those distributed on Bootstrap CDN: * > Anthony> https://maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com/bootstrap/3.3.4/css/bootstrap.css > Anthony> * > Anthony> https://maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com/bootstrap/3.3.4/css/bootstrap.min.css > > Is the css file actually source code though? > At least for bootstrap 4, the source code is in sas and the css is not > the preferred form for modification. > I think bootstrap has been using sas for a long time, so I suspect css > is not source code for bootstrap 3 either. Good point, only slightly wrong: Bootstrap 3 uses less, Bootstrap 4 uses (scss encoding of) sass (spelled with 3 s'es). So indeed css is _not_ the source, even for Booststrap 3. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: signature