On Feb 04, Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> wrote: > We'd need to decide exactly which of our 32-bit ports we would want > to do this path with (probably armhf->arhmft?, maybe > armel->armelt?, i386->i386t?. mipsel???). Due to the libc6 soname I agree with Ansgar here: there is no point in rebuilding i386. The porters for the other architectures who believe that there is value in such a port should explain why they believe that in ~10 years from now there will still be NEW 32 bit hardware that will run Debian. The real questions should be: what is the latest reasonable year to eventually start these new ports? 2038 is far away, and maybe enough procrastination will solve this... -- ciao, Marco
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature