[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: seccomp woes



On Sat, 20 Jul 2019 00:21:10 +0200, Christoph Biedl wrote:

> * Centralize the list of supported archs in the seccomp packages. By
>   either creating an empty libseccomp-dev for the archs where seccomp
>   is not supported, or by creating a "libseccomp-dev-dummy" for these.
>   In the latter case package maintainers would have to do a one-time
>   change of the build dependency into "libseccomp-dev |
>   libseccomp-dev-dummy" and can focus on other issues then.

AFAIK this won't work because sbuild on the buildds is configured to
only use the first alternative from a list of build dependencies.
 

Cheers,
gregor

-- 
 .''`.  https://info.comodo.priv.at -- Debian Developer https://www.debian.org
 : :' : OpenPGP fingerprint D1E1 316E 93A7 60A8 104D  85FA BB3A 6801 8649 AA06
 `. `'  Member VIBE!AT & SPI Inc. -- Supporter Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-   

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature


Reply to: