Re: Do we want to Require or Recommend DH

[Alf Gaida <agaida@siduction.org>]

On 13.05.19 15:39, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Maybe we could also make the "should" stronger:
>
> - new packages (except if they are ment to become build-depends of
>    debhelper)*must*  either use dh or cdbs.
> - old packages should be switched to dh (or cdbs).
>
> And then turn this "should" into a "must" for bookworm (and thus make it
> RC then as well).

Thanks Holger, couln't write it better, fully aggree.

Cheers Alf