Re: Bug#888743: Debian vs Linux namespaces, NMU lsb-base
- To: Didier 'OdyX' Raboud <odyx@debian.org>
- Cc: Geert Stappers <stappers@debian.org>, 888743@bugs.debian.org, debian-devel@lists.debian.org, 858837@bugs.debian.org, Harald Dunkel <harald.dunkel@aixigo.de>
- Subject: Re: Bug#888743: Debian vs Linux namespaces, NMU lsb-base
- From: Vincent Bernat <bernat@debian.org>
- Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 22:52:01 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 87tvfs3pq6.fsf@debian.org>
- Mail-followup-to: Didier 'OdyX' Raboud <odyx@debian.org>, Geert Stappers <stappers@debian.org>, 888743@bugs.debian.org, debian-devel@lists.debian.org, 858837@bugs.debian.org, Harald Dunkel <harald.dunkel@aixigo.de>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 2238596.lYp4pqUr1o@odyx.org> (Didier Raboud's message of "Sun, 24 Mar 2019 14:40:33 +0100")
- References: <[🔎] 4ce38bfa-256a-5abe-7f77-942786651009@afaics.de> <87ea7a1a-7d62-7745-cccb-57cebb684534@aixigo.de> <[🔎] 20190324084212.hvn5k7ojlmmmzgdq@gpm.stappers.nl> <[🔎] 2238596.lYp4pqUr1o@odyx.org>
❦ 24 mars 2019 14:40 +01, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud <odyx@debian.org>:
>> Wouldn't it break chrooted processes? But mostly, as the whole pattern
>> is broken, it seems to be a low-effort solution.
>
> Vincent: what scenario did you have in mind?
For the first part, any daemon chrooting (like HAProxy, lldpd). For the
second part, it's just killing by name is fragile. Supervisors or PID
files should be used instead. start-stop-daemon makes it easy to get a
PID file for a program not able to provide one.
--
Make it right before you make it faster.
- The Elements of Programming Style (Kernighan & Plauger)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Reply to: