[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Reg: Debian 9.8 version support to IntelNUC7i5BNH



Hi Debian Devel team,


Currently, I working on IntelNUC7i5BNH.  I would like to use Debian 9.8 version in IntelNUC7i5BNH. can I use Debian 9.8 version and is it support to IntelNUC7i5BNH?


I have seen in the below link  Debian 9.2.1 (stretch) version used in IntelNUC7i5BNH.

https://wiki.debian.org/InstallingDebianOn/Intel/NUC7i5BNH

please let me know , if anymore difference is there.

Thanks & Regards,

Srinivas Rao.



::DISCLAIMER::
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only. E-mail transmission is not guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or may contain viruses in transmission. The e mail and its contents (with or without referred errors) shall therefore not attach any liability on the originator or HCL or its affiliates. Views or opinions, if any, presented in this email are solely those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of HCL or its affiliates. Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and / or publication of this message without the prior written consent of authorized representative of HCL is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify the sender immediately. Before opening any email and/or attachments, please check them for viruses and other defects.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply to: