Hi, > On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 03:14:07PM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > > I am undecided whether or not this package should be included in Debian > > 10 (aka buster). It clearly is useful to many people, but its long-term > > maintenance is unclear. > > keepassxc is also going to be in Debian 10 (unless something happens to > prevent it), so if the maintenance story is better there, I don't think > there's a use-case for keepassx that is not fulfilled by keepassxc I'd > lean towards dropping keepassx for Buster and possibly even using > package metadata in keepassxc and compat symlinks for a smooth > transition. As I am currently involved in evaluating password managers, also a +1 from me for dropping keepassx. -nik
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature