Re: Remainings of old versions of packages in UDD / tracker
On 08/01/19 at 13:25 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was seeking for remaining references to anonscm in packages in UDD.
> I've found the following strange hit:
>
> udd=> select source, version, maintainer, vcs_browser, release from sources where source = 'r-bioc-deseq2' and release = 'sid' ;
> source | version | maintainer | vcs_browser | release
> ---------------+---------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+---------
> r-bioc-deseq2 | 1.16.1-1 | Debian Med Packaging Team <debian-med-packaging@lists.alioth.debian.org> | https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-med/r-bioc-deseq2.git | sid
> r-bioc-deseq2 | 1.22.2+dfsg-1 | Debian R Packages Maintainers <r-pkg-team@alioth-lists.debian.net> | https://salsa.debian.org/r-pkg-team/r-bioc-deseq2 | sid
> (2 Zeilen)
>
>
> which means the source package r-bioc-deseq2 exists twice in sid. There
> is also an entry in tracker[1] mentioning version 1.16.1-1 which should
> have gone since a long time. The situation is similar for:
>
> r-bioc-genefilter
> r-bioc-shortread
> r-bioc-variantannotation
> r-cran-dplyr
> r-cran-haplo.stats
> r-cran-luminescence
> r-cran-phylobase
> r-cran-purrr
> r-cran-raster
> r-cran-rsqlite
> r-cran-scales
> r-cran-surveillance
> r-cran-tibble
> r-cran-tidyr
> r-cran-tidyselect
> r-other-mott-happy
>
>
> Any idea why old versions of these packages might remain in UDD (and
> thus probably in tracker since it is reading UDD)?
Did you check the extra_source_only column?
Lucas
Reply to: