[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Nix and non-standard-toplevel-dir



On Wed, Jan 02, 2019 at 07:10:06PM +0100, Kai Harries wrote:
> [4] https://nixos.org/~eelco/pubs/phd-thesis.pdf
This is an interesting text. It shows that the author has read the FHS but
chose to ignore it. The only ref to FHS is in the following text:

"""
For instance, storing components in an essentially flat, rigid
“address space” of components is very different from the way software is typically stored
in most operating systems1

1
Indeed, no Linux distribution based on Nix will ever be compliant with the Linux Standards Base [82, 81]!
"""


-- 
WBR, wRAR

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: