Hi Mo, Quoting Mo Zhou (2019-12-07 08:44:47) > I went through the options in the init-system-GR[1] but I feel > difficult to tell the subtle differences between the options. I'd like > to ask for some hints here. > > Option F is distince from the others as it clearly emphasizes "deeper > systemd integration". Option E puts equal weights to both systemd and > non-systemd solutions. So let's skip the two. > > The rest options, i.e. B A D H G, look nearly the same to me: "first > tier support for systemd, second tier for others" > The only difference I noted is the bug severity for non-systemd > support. > > In which way(s) are options (B, A, D, H, G) different from each other? > A couple of keywords should be helpful enough to differentiate them. > > Thanks in advance. > > > P.S. It could be extremely useful if a straightforward comparison > table like > [this](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_file_systems) is > available. But it isn't. > > I'd kindly suggest the future GR initiators make some comparison > tables as long as options with subtle differences appear. > > [1] https://www.debian.org/vote/2019/vote_002 The very act of comparing is subjective, so finding one to be the "canonical" one might end up being difficult. I suggest to read the threads on debian-vote@l.d.o which includes both a) elaborations from some authors and b) attempts at making comparisons and emphasizing the differences. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: signature