Re: Possible doc package side-effect from going source-only upload [and 1 more messages]
On 19 September 2019 at 20:40, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| On 19 September 2019 at 16:03, Guillem Jover wrote:
| | On Thu, 2019-09-19 at 07:15:43 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| | > So presumably the dependency graph within debian/rules is wrong. Would
| | > anybody here know
| | >
| | > - either a failsafe idiom forcing the right thing to happen
| | > - or a more efficient way
| | >
| | > to ensure the binary-arch is built before binary-all? Should I force it? Is
| | > that wasteful? Is there a recommended way?
| |
| | I've just skimmed over the rules, but I indeed see several problematic
| | constructs there:
| |
| | - «build: build-arch» that should include build-indep too.
|
| Ok.
Tried, but failed. In 3.6.1-5 I now have
modified debian/rules
@@ -215,7 +215,8 @@ denmark:
## edd 15 Jan 2004 trying again on build only build: build-arch build-indep
## the main hook is to then have binary depend on both
## binary-arch and binary-indep, and those on their builds
-build: build-arch
+## edd 19 Sep 2019 for source uploads also build build-indep
+build: build-arch build-indep
build-arch: make-arch
ifeq (,$(filter nocheck,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)))
Fetched the package from pool and r-base-html is still 'empty'.
Dirk
--
http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | edd@debian.org
Reply to: