Re: Git Packaging Round 2: SHOULD Not or MUSt NOT Github
On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 10:29:32AM +0530, Balasankar "Balu" C wrote:
> > What exactly do you propose here? The Salsa admins look like not
> > accepting more contributors, neither seem open to suggestions. They just
> > do "their way". I've countless times wrote to both them and in public
> > that I'd love to be involved to make things more free. They also refused
> > to use a packaged version of Gitlab even before it was a thing. They
> > decided to use Google service, without prior communication about it and
> > agreement of the community. When some of us pointed out it wasn't ok, it
> > was strongly rejected, despite any possible offer to use something else
> > (like Swift storage of other providers).
>
> This feels like a serious problem to me. Could you also share links, please?
https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20180819073423.xlnd4rqzc4elbgnd@shell.thinkmo.de
Regards,
Bastian
--
You! What PLANET is this!
-- McCoy, "The City on the Edge of Forever", stardate 3134.0
Reply to: