Re: Git Packaging Round 2: SHOULD Not or MUSt NOT Github

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Git Packaging Round 2: SHOULD Not or MUSt NOT Github
From: Simon Richter <sjr@debian.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 15:10:36 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20190913131036.GB5872@psi5.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 395e158c-6241-d714-6637-22d59f073965@siduction.org>
References: <[🔎] tslef0q8oa9.fsf@suchdamage.org> <[🔎] 23927.51367.848949.15475@chiark.greenend.org.uk> <[🔎] tslwoedy93e.fsf_-_@suchdamage.org> <[🔎] 20190912183442.63c27a2c@ramme.local.tld> <[🔎] 20190913081835.6c4wr76jzv5cox3c@shell.thinkmo.de> <[🔎] 395e158c-6241-d714-6637-22d59f073965@siduction.org>

Hi,

On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 02:51:47PM +0200, Alf Gaida wrote:

> Is it really so hard to understand? Github, Gitlab and other service are
> just tools. I don't care if they are free or non-free.

For Debian, free software is kind of important.

   Simon

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Git Packaging Round 2: SHOULD Not or MUSt NOT Github
  - From: Alf Gaida <agaida@siduction.org>

References:
- Git Packaging Round 2: When to Salsa
  - From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org>
- Re: Git Packaging Round 2: When to Salsa
  - From: Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
- Re: Git Packaging Round 2: SHOULD Not or MUSt NOT Github
  - From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org>
- Re: Git Packaging Round 2: SHOULD Not or MUSt NOT Github
  - From: Alf Gaida <agaida@siduction.org>
- Re: Git Packaging Round 2: SHOULD Not or MUSt NOT Github
  - From: Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org>
- Re: Git Packaging Round 2: SHOULD Not or MUSt NOT Github
  - From: Alf Gaida <agaida@siduction.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Git Packaging Round 2: When to Salsa
Next by Date: Re: Git Packaging Round 2: SHOULD Not or MUSt NOT Github
Previous by thread: Re: Git Packaging Round 2: SHOULD Not or MUSt NOT Github
Next by thread: Re: Git Packaging Round 2: SHOULD Not or MUSt NOT Github
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread