Re: lintian-brush adds redundant data
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 2:48 PM Andreas Tille wrote:
> DEP-12 is declared as "Work in progress" (without any progress since 5
> years) while DEP-5 is well established and decided. Charles and I
> invented d/u/metadata to store publication information and it turned out
> that there is other sensible information about upstream that can be
> stored there as well. I'd vote against any duplication of information
> in any way. So as long as Name and Contact are defined in DEP-5 it
> should not be in DEP-12.
These fields seem like they belong in DEP-12 more than DEP-5.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Reply to: