Re: B-D on src package? (was: Re: Challenge from Julia's non-standard vendored openblas"64_"
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: B-D on src package? (was: Re: Challenge from Julia's non-standard vendored openblas"64_"
- From: Tzafrir Cohen <tzafrir@cohens.org.il>
- Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2019 12:54:16 +0300
- Message-id: <[🔎] 51e295f2-e4a5-693f-d094-32808bad881a@cohens.org.il>
- In-reply-to: <CAKTje6GmeHaM+8vtvD8xjAsGPRtBwbZnALiTFEWZ+s1cf6tCVw@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <9b29ad6e70331b870f2caea14dd4aacc@debian.org> <23869.40821.435698.810894@chiark.greenend.org.uk> <9109967e9b6981bed98b123c0f01ea6e@debian.org> <CAKTje6GmeHaM+8vtvD8xjAsGPRtBwbZnALiTFEWZ+s1cf6tCVw@mail.gmail.com>
On 28/07/2019 20:32, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 10:04 PM Mo Zhou wrote:
>
>> Is such demand common enough among developers?
>
> There are several ways this would be useful:
> To replace all out-of-tree Linux kernel module -source packages, so
> that dkms/etc doesn't need a binary package duplicating the source.
So how / where exactly would you build modules? Modify dkms to use
source packages? module-assistant again?
-- Tzafrir
Reply to: