Re: And in 2019? Re: -flto to become more of a routine - any change in opinion since 2011?
I wrote:
>in GCC 6 IIRC and *still* pertinent in GCC 8 and I believe 9,
Still present in (sid/amd64):
• gcc-8 (= 8.3.0-19)
• gcc-9 (= 9.1.0-10)
• gcc-snapshot (= 1:20190719-1)
>>I'm currently compiling e2fsprogs with LTO for Debian --- and I'm
>>seriously considering ditching that change. The reason why is because
>Ted, I agree, please drop LTO from e2fsprogs as well.
Given the wrong-code bug in mksh produced by GCC’s LTO, I shudder
to think what it might do to my filesystem.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
„Cool, /usr/share/doc/mksh/examples/uhr.gz ist ja ein Grund,
mksh auf jedem System zu installieren.“
-- XTaran auf der OpenRheinRuhr, ganz begeistert
(EN: “[…]uhr.gz is a reason to install mksh on every system.”)
Reply to: