Re: How to properly upload a bunch of packages with mutual dependencies?
Moin,
ich habe das oft so gelöst, daß ich ftpmaster per IRC die Abhängigkeiten
erklärt habe. Der Nebeneffekt war manchmal, daß sie das gleich vom
Tisch haben wollten und schneller reagiert hatten. ;-)
Der Channel ist #debian-ftp.
Diesmal wirklich eine nicht-öffentliche Mail ... ausnahmsweise. ;-)
Viel Erfolg
Andreas.
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 10:53:20AM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote:
> Hello,
>
> When packaging, it typically happens that there is the tool you really
> want to package and a set of build dependencies that you package with it
> because they are build dependencies. So, after lots of packaging,
> packaging, packaging, you eventually get the package of interest to
> build and test properly. Now you want to upload and forget until there
> is a new version.
>
> What has bitten me a few times is that I sequentially (package with no
> dependencies first) uploaded to the new queue. One then has a couple of
> packages in there. And then the first-uploaded leaf package gets
> rejected. There is then no need whatsoever for the ftpadmins to inspect
> all reverse dependencies. And it also happens that I miss the rejection
> email that GMX often directs to my spam folder - not helpful. I have
> since started to just upload to salsa and to only upload once the build
> dependencies are in the distribution. But I then also forget about them.
> And I _want_ to the luxury not need to think about them. My mind should
> be busy with other things.
>
> Would it be helpful to transform our New Queue to a New Tree? To a New
> DAG? Packages rejected from the queue should be indicated as a "ghost
> package" when there are dependencies? Maybe link rejected packages with
> their whereabouts on salsa to invite for team maintenance? This may then
> look a bit like a "packaging management system". Would this be a
> reasonable Google Summer of Code project for 2020?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Steffen
>
>
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: