[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#927766: ITP: ruby-html-proofer -- Test your rendered HTML files to make sure they're accurate



Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Daniel Leidert <dleidert@debian.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

* Package name    : ruby-html-proofer
  Version         : 3.10.2
  Upstream Author : Garen Torikian
* URL             : https://github.com/gjtorikian/html-proofer
* License         : MIT
  Programming Lang: Ruby
  Description     : Test your rendered HTML files to make sure they're accurate

HTMLProofer is a set of tests to validate your HTML output. These tests check
if your image references are legitimate, if they have alt tags, if your
internal links are working, and so on. It's intended to be an all-in-one
checker for your output.

In scope is any well-known and widely-used test for HTML document quality.
A major use is continuous integration, so reliable results are a must have.
Correctness is usually balanced over performance. And, if necessary, one
should be able to trace this program's detection of HTML errors back to
documented best practices or standards, such as W3 specifications.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=zjER
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: