Re: Introducting Debian Trends: historical graphs about Debian packaging practices, and "packages smells"

To: Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@debian.org>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Introducting Debian Trends: historical graphs about Debian packaging practices, and "packages smells"
From: Shengjing Zhu <zhsj@debian.org>
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2019 18:35:06 +0800
Message-id: <[🔎] CAFyCLW9_6LyUb6eS0VCtyB_1ep2=ahYMruSn3Nhs3cjcu=yqwQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20190413082053.oivjufvhdyo2z4dw@xanadu.blop.info>
References: <[🔎] 20190413082053.oivjufvhdyo2z4dw@xanadu.blop.info>

On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 4:21 PM Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@debian.org> wrote:
>
> TL;DR: see https://trends.debian.net and
> https://trends.debian.net/#smells
>

These graphs look ambiguous... Shouldn't the x-axis be year?

-- 
Shengjing Zhu

Reply to:

References:
- Introducting Debian Trends: historical graphs about Debian packaging practices, and "packages smells"
  - From: Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Hurd-i386 and kfreebsd-{i386,amd64} removal
Next by Date: Re: Hurd-i386 and kfreebsd-{i386,amd64} removal
Previous by thread: Re: native packages? (Re: Introducting Debian Trends: historical graphs about Debian packaging practices, and "packages smells")
Next by thread: Re: Introducting Debian Trends: historical graphs about Debian packaging practices, and "packages smells"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread