Re: Nix and non-standard-toplevel-dir
Russ Allbery writes ("Re: Nix and non-standard-toplevel-dir"):
> I think this is a case where we should waive FHS for this package, due to
> the unique nature of this package.
I agree for the reasons Russ gives.
> I don't think it's worth writing an explicit Policy exception for this,
> since it's a single edge case. Instead, I think it's a good use of a
> Lintian override documenting what's going on. Obviously, if Nix becomes
> really popular in the long run, we can then go back and write this into
This is a good approach.
Ian Jackson <email@example.com> These opinions are my own.
If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.