[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Nix and non-standard-toplevel-dir

Russ Allbery writes ("Re: Nix and non-standard-toplevel-dir"):
> I think this is a case where we should waive FHS for this package, due to
> the unique nature of this package.

I agree for the reasons Russ gives.

> I don't think it's worth writing an explicit Policy exception for this,
> since it's a single edge case.  Instead, I think it's a good use of a
> Lintian override documenting what's going on.  Obviously, if Nix becomes
> really popular in the long run, we can then go back and write this into
> Policy.

This is a good approach.


Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>   These opinions are my own.

If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.

Reply to: