Hello, one short remark Am 19.07.2018 um 18:06 schrieb Lars Wirzenius: > I've recently made the first release of ick, my CI engine > (https://ick.liw.fi/), which was built by ick itself. It went OK, but > the process needs improvement. This mail has some pondering on how > the process of building Debian packages should happen in the best > possible taste. > * `foo_1.2-1~debian8.dsc` — source package for Debian 8 > * `foo_1.2-1~debian8.debian.tar.xz` — Debian packaging and changes > * `foo_1.2-1~debian8_amd64.deb` — binary package for Debian 8, amd64 > * `foo_1.2-1~debian8_riscv.deb` — binary package for Debian 8, riscv > > * `foo_1.2-1~debian9.dsc` — source package for Debian 9 > * `foo_1.2-1~debian9.debian.tar.xz` — Debian packaging and changes > * `foo_1.2-1~debian9_amd64.deb` — binary package for Debian 9, amd64 > * `foo_1.2-1~debian9_riscv.deb` — binary package for Debian 9, riscv Please regard that foo_1.2-1~debian9 is greater than foo_1.2-1~debian10, which stand for Debian Buster -- Mechtilde Stehmann ## Debian Developer ## Loook, calender-exchange-provider, libreoffice-canzeley-client ## PGP encryption welcome ## F0E3 7F3D C87A 4998 2899 39E7 F287 7BBA 141A AD7F
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature