Re: SALSA migration of XML/SGML packages (sgml-data for me)
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, agmartin@debian.org, syq@debian.org, rene@debian.org, neil@debian.org, dleidert@debian.org, r.naundorf@fh-muenster.de, debacle@debian.org, eugene@debian.org, apo@debian.org, herlantj@gmail.com
- Subject: Re: SALSA migration of XML/SGML packages (sgml-data for me)
- From: Osamu Aoki <osamu@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2018 23:46:48 +0900
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20180709144648.GC1162@goofy.osamu.debian.net>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20180709140743.GK31710@mapreri.org>
- References: <[🔎] 20180708142057.GA32695@goofy.osamu.debian.net> <[🔎] 20180708163837.GW31710@mapreri.org> <[🔎] 20180709135229.GA7682@goofy.osamu.debian.net> <[🔎] 20180709140743.GK31710@mapreri.org>
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 04:07:44PM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 10:52:29PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
...
> > Since we have developer ML as debian-sgml@lists.debian.org, why not use
> > it as group mail address. Then we already have well supported stable
> > archived ML system. ...
>
> TBH, I never subscribed to that ML, as for some reason it wasn't used
> (if you check the archive, it's pretty much all spam in the last years).
>
> Indeed, at this point it would make a ton of sense to change all the
> packages to just use that ML, given that we have it.
> What do you think? Should we ask all the people that are in CC here to
> subscribe that ML and change the packages?
I vote for this: debian-sgml@lists.debian.org
(If anyone has energy, ask ML admin to make this
debian-xml-sgml@lists.debian.org but that can be dome by making it as
alias later.)
Osamu
PS: Are team+foo@tracker.d.o mails archived?
Reply to: