On Fri, 23 Feb 2018, Geert Stappers wrote: > On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 07:32:24PM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > On Fri, 23 Feb 2018, Geert Stappers wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 06:54:29PM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > > > On Fri, 23 Feb 2018, Enrico Zini wrote: > > > > > Please do not switch Alioth off, nor disable creation of new accounts on > > > > > alioth, until then. Being able to get a SSO certificate as a non-DD is > > > > > currently a required step to become a DD. > > > > Then the dd process should get fixed, not making again something to a backend > > > > which isn't meaned like that (we had the same problem with alioth and > > > > debconf). > > > > > > > > > > Mmm, there was something with lemon and LDAP ... websearch ... yes found it. > > > > > > https://lemonldap-ng.org/start > > > > > > Text from that webpage > > > > > > LemonLDAP::NG is an open source Web Single Sign On (WebSSO), Access > > > Management and Identity Federation product, written in Perl and > > > Javascript. > > > > > > LemonLDAP::NG is a free software, released under GPL license. > > > > > > LemonLDAP::NG is the first SSO software deployed in French > > > administrations. It can handle large-scale organization (tested with > > > hundreds of thousands users). Many private firms use it too. > > > [ https://lemonldap-ng.org/references ] > > > > > > How much would it fill our needs?? > > Yes, thats already in the process of the gsoc project. > > It is very high ranked on my list, however it is just a frontend, there is a > > backend missing and its management (something that manages ldap). > > I went to Debian wiki, searched for 'SSO' > and got https://wiki.debian.org/Salsa/SSO > > Would that be the proper place to track status of Debian Single Sign On? I don't think so, alsa will be a consumer of sso - not the provider, therefore it should have its own namespace Alex
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature