[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Proposal: Repository for fast-paced package backports

>> I actually think volatile is a good name. After all, it's not so far
>from the previous volatile.
>volatile is a very bad name for this because we've used it already for
>something else.

Well, I consider it more or less the same basic idea. The old and new ideas have more in common than not, with the only difference being that previously, volatile packages also had versions in stable.


Reply to: