On Wednesday, 19 December 2018 9:17:51 AM AEDT Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Did you mean: in an unstable-like “volatile” repo? Yes perhaps more like "unstable". I'm saying that IMHO we should have only one common/shared "PPA" for "stable" users. I do not want many personal/individual archives. > Backports have a defined mission, which has nothing to do > with the “volatile” proposal. What you were referring to, > integration- and checks-wise, is, I think what you get in > *any* repository maintained by ftpmasters, so it’d be more > like sid, except only a partial distribution (add-on). I also think that we could just relax official "backports" criteria but that would be so hard that it seem easier to arrange another "volatile" repo... -- Regards, Dmitry Smirnov. --- Success consists of going from failure to failure without loss of enthusiasm. -- Winston Churchill
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.