On Wednesday, 19 December 2018 9:17:51 AM AEDT Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Did you mean: in an unstable-like “volatile” repo?
Yes perhaps more like "unstable".
I'm saying that IMHO we should have only one common/shared "PPA" for "stable"
users. I do not want many personal/individual archives.
> Backports have a defined mission, which has nothing to do
> with the “volatile” proposal. What you were referring to,
> integration- and checks-wise, is, I think what you get in
> *any* repository maintained by ftpmasters, so it’d be more
> like sid, except only a partial distribution (add-on).
I also think that we could just relax official "backports" criteria but that
would be so hard that it seem easier to arrange another "volatile" repo...
--
Regards,
Dmitry Smirnov.
---
Success consists of going from failure to failure without loss of enthusiasm.
-- Winston Churchill
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.