Re: usrmerge -- plan B?
Russ Allbery writes ("Re: usrmerge -- plan B?"):
> This is a much better summary of the thread, and I wish that you would
> have said this instead of claiming incorrectly that those same people are
> the ones advocating for a full merge of all systems.
Marco d'Itri writes ("Re: usrmerge -- plan B?"):
> If you are seriously concerned with the small issuses caused by the
> transition to merged-/usr then I have a better proposal.
> Plan C: just stop supporting non-merged-/usr systems since these
> problems are caused by having to support both, and there is no real
> benefit in doing that other than pleasing the few people who are scared
> by changes.