Re: Should libpam-elogind Provide libpam-systemd ?
Simon McVittie writes ("Re: Should libpam-elogind Provide libpam-systemd ?"):
> I don't want this to turn into "us vs. them", and I'm trying not to get
> drawn into a debate about the merits of these approaches because I can
> already see how much time and motivation that will burn if it happens,
> most likely leaving each of us angry with the other and without any
> actually changed opinions.
Thanks. I wanted to say separately that appreciate that and I
appreciate your technical input, even if I may not agree with
> I've gone to some lengths to make sure that
> the conceptual model implied by dbus-user-session is not mandatory in
> Debian (which is why we have it as a separate package at all);
That is also helpful. Thank you.