Re: julia_1.0.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Ian Jackson writes ("Re: julia_1.0.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED"):
> Lumin writes ("Re: julia_1.0.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED"):
> > 1. Isn't "incomplete backtrace" a sensible reason to keep debug symbols?
> > Policy said "should" but not "must". Please tell me what I can do in
> > order to help improve the src:julia package to satisfy the requirements?
>
> My main concern here is this: AFAICT this package has been REJECTed
> solely for this reason. Why is this bug[1] a reason for a REJECT ?
> ISTM that it should be filed in the BTS and handled like a normal bug.
Ping, ftpmaster ?
Ian.
> [1] Assuming it is a bug. The discussion here suggests to me that it
> is, but it is really unhelpful to be having it on debian-devel in the
> context of an ftpmaster REJECTion.
--
Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> These opinions are my own.
If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.
Reply to: