Re: julia_1.0.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

[Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>]

Lumin writes ("Re: julia_1.0.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED"):
> 1. Isn't "incomplete backtrace" a sensible reason to keep debug symbols?
>    Policy said "should" but not "must". Please tell me what I can do in
>    order to help improve the src:julia package to satisfy the requirements?

My main concern here is this: AFAICT this package has been REJECTed
solely for this reason.  Why is this bug[1] a reason for a REJECT ?
ISTM that it should be filed in the BTS and handled like a normal bug.

[1] Assuming it is a bug.  The discussion here suggests to me that it
is, but it is really unhelpful to be having it on debian-devel in the
context of an ftpmaster REJECTion.

Ian.