RE:Feedback request about the Alba Upstream to Debian packaging effort

[PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr>]

>> It just comes to my mind that Maybe it does not fit well with  my convention
>> for exeprimental numbering whcih is
>> blablab_x.y.z-t~exp1
>> so maybe the best way would be to use
>> blalbla_x.y.z-t~~alba+1

>So, you would not use the "bpo9" part for the packages built for stretch?

Not at all, I would use the bpo, this is just that sometimes we use experimental in order to prepare transitions.
And I use ~expN  which is > ~alba+N

So I am wondering if you want to create

blabla_x.y.z-t~exp1~alba+1

just wondering.

Cheers

Fred