RE:Feedback request about the Alba Upstream to Debian packaging effort
>> It just comes to my mind that Maybe it does not fit well with my convention
>> for exeprimental numbering whcih is
>> so maybe the best way would be to use
>So, you would not use the "bpo9" part for the packages built for stretch?
Not at all, I would use the bpo, this is just that sometimes we use experimental in order to prepare transitions.
And I use ~expN which is > ~alba+N
So I am wondering if you want to create