[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: remote: GitLab: LFS objects are missing. Ensure LFS is properly set up or try a manual "git lfs push --all".



On Wed, 30 May 2018, Geert Stappers wrote:

> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 11:19:14AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > On Wed, 30 May 2018, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > Hi again,
>  
>   :-)
> 
> 
> > > On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 07:50:01AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > > > > > Your repo has lfs disabled. You should enable it. 
> > > > > 
> > > > > How can I do this?
> > > > > I've just found[1]:  "Your administrator only need to enable the LFS option."
> > > > *seufz* we enabled it, but as you can guess it needs to get enabled per repo.
> > > > 
> > > > Settings -> Permissions -> Git Large File Storage
> > > 
> > > Thanks for the hint.  I would not call "Permissions" the obvious place to
> > > look for this and my web search did not uncover this, sorry.
> > > 
> > > Unfortunately it does not work yet:
> > use the support tracker and I will look after it when I have time.
> 
> Where is that support tracker?
> 
> (It feels strang to report "salsa is broken" at Salsa itself.)
(sorry thats complete nonsense, if the webfrontend would be broken at all.
yes - use IRC. But thats not the case here). 

there are several options to find it: 

1) read my announcements: https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2018/01/msg00004.html
2) press help on salsa: https://salsa.debian.org/help
3) check the wiki https://wiki.debian.org/Salsa/Doc#Support

> 
> > debian-devel is not on the list of salsa supportchannels.
>  
> Even multiple suportchannels for salsa.
> What are the preferred top three?
For all longer taking things of course tickets. 

> In other words
> How cool would it be if the "not here" would have travelled with
>  at URL you find a list of salsa supportchannels
How cool would it be if people would use their heads. I can only tell people
where the door is, but they have to use it on their own. 

Alex - fed up with explaining the same things again and again and again 
 


Reply to: